I can't help thinking this whole business of awarding Obama the Nobel Peace Prize is some kind of desperate attempt to rekindle public support for him, now that people generally seem to be losing faith in his Messiah status. Perhaps it's hoped that this will help boost his "good guy" image. Well, if dear old Barack is such a peacemaker, why hasn't he taken steps to withdraw military forces from Afghanistan/Iraq? Would someone please tell me what the point of these wars is? (Don't say it's got anything to do with fighting terrorism.) What a farce this "Peace" prize must be. Then again, it was awarded to globalist Henry Kissinger in the past, charming man that he is, so what can we expect.
I'll take this opportunity to repost my thoughts on Obama written earlier this year, formerly hosted on my now-defunct Dare.nu website....
__________________________________________
I’m naturally sceptical of anything massively hyped or praised by the media and the public at large; Barack Obama is no exception. Even when I disregard all of his ultra-left leanings, questionable background, the NWO minions he surrounds himself with and the fact he may not even be eligible for role of President due to his dodgy birth certificate, my intuition tells me that he is bad news. I’m tempted to brand him "a nasty piece of work". But don’t tell that to the swooning public, who see him as some sort of Messianic figure.
He’s so obviously in bed with the elite that it’s actually nauseating to see him worshipped as some kind of beacon of "hope and change". More of the same, more like - or perhaps even WORSE. Thanks to his charisma and oratory skills, he can get away with far more than George "not the sharpest tool in the box" Bush, and could feed virtually any line to the public and they’d swallow it. Am I the only one who finds his zealous, glassy-eyed supporters a little scary? And his Youth Brigade? And this? Even if Obama is NOT the new Hitler (even though their rise to power has some disturbing parallels), his policies should stand ALONE on their merits, without this kind of propaganda. This is cult of personality and it does not belong in politics. Again, it echoes of Nazi Germany. People think they’re immune to brainwashing and propaganda and fascism ("it could never happen in America") but Hitler had the masses in a hypnotic trance the same way Obama does now.
What also irks me is the reverse-racism thing that’s going on with him. I once saw a comment on the internet that actually stated, "It wouldn’t matter if Obama turned out to be as bad as Bush, because he’s black". Imagine the outcry if this sentiment were reversed in support of a white leader. Skin colour should not be an issue in politics; as I said, a candidate’s policies should stand on their own merits. Sure he’s (half) black, but that doesn’t mean he’s a competent president or even a good person. It doesn’t mean he’s not 100% in cahoots with the global super-elite.
Finally, I’d like to comment on the problem-reaction-solution dynamic that’s evident here. In this case, Bush was the problem (in the eyes of the masses), the public cried out for change in reaction to Bush’s perceived failings, and Obama was presented as the solution to the problem. (Notice that the new Prez failed to define what that nebulous "change" would be - it’s classic empty rhetoric, yet people still applaud him and cheer and faint at his speeches.) But of course, the right/left-wing two-party system is a false dichotomy; there really is no difference between Bush and Obama in terms of the agenda they serve. They’re puppets controlled by the same puppetmaster. I feel that Bush laid a good bit of groundwork and now Obama will build on it, taking us a few steps closer to the New World Order.
Normally I ignore the mass media and politics, thinking it’s all staged and a farce. But I observed this US election and the media furore surrounding it and shook my head at it all. The only seemingly sane voice to be heard, from what I gather, is Libertarian Ron Paul - advocate of freedom AND limited government (the two go hand-in-hand). But can any politician be 100% independent of the elite agenda, and still get their voice heard and mount a serious campaign? I doubt it. So who knows. But I do feel this is an interesting time in history, so I’m observing it all from a distance with a sceptical mind.
UPDATE (June 2009): I subscribe to a newsletter pertaining to all things spiritual and conspiracy-related, from an esoteric Christian perspective. I got an email recently and was kind of surprised to read their take on Obama: according to them, he is not working for the elite at all, but purely his own selfish agenda, and his election was not part of the elite’s plan. That threw me for a loop. Personally I find it hard to believe in light of the fact that the elite-owned media seemed to aggressively promote Obama, and the fact the whole election process is questionable anyway. I suppose the jury is still out on the new prez...
I'll take this opportunity to repost my thoughts on Obama written earlier this year, formerly hosted on my now-defunct Dare.nu website....
__________________________________________
I’m naturally sceptical of anything massively hyped or praised by the media and the public at large; Barack Obama is no exception. Even when I disregard all of his ultra-left leanings, questionable background, the NWO minions he surrounds himself with and the fact he may not even be eligible for role of President due to his dodgy birth certificate, my intuition tells me that he is bad news. I’m tempted to brand him "a nasty piece of work". But don’t tell that to the swooning public, who see him as some sort of Messianic figure.
He’s so obviously in bed with the elite that it’s actually nauseating to see him worshipped as some kind of beacon of "hope and change". More of the same, more like - or perhaps even WORSE. Thanks to his charisma and oratory skills, he can get away with far more than George "not the sharpest tool in the box" Bush, and could feed virtually any line to the public and they’d swallow it. Am I the only one who finds his zealous, glassy-eyed supporters a little scary? And his Youth Brigade? And this? Even if Obama is NOT the new Hitler (even though their rise to power has some disturbing parallels), his policies should stand ALONE on their merits, without this kind of propaganda. This is cult of personality and it does not belong in politics. Again, it echoes of Nazi Germany. People think they’re immune to brainwashing and propaganda and fascism ("it could never happen in America") but Hitler had the masses in a hypnotic trance the same way Obama does now.
What also irks me is the reverse-racism thing that’s going on with him. I once saw a comment on the internet that actually stated, "It wouldn’t matter if Obama turned out to be as bad as Bush, because he’s black". Imagine the outcry if this sentiment were reversed in support of a white leader. Skin colour should not be an issue in politics; as I said, a candidate’s policies should stand on their own merits. Sure he’s (half) black, but that doesn’t mean he’s a competent president or even a good person. It doesn’t mean he’s not 100% in cahoots with the global super-elite.
Finally, I’d like to comment on the problem-reaction-solution dynamic that’s evident here. In this case, Bush was the problem (in the eyes of the masses), the public cried out for change in reaction to Bush’s perceived failings, and Obama was presented as the solution to the problem. (Notice that the new Prez failed to define what that nebulous "change" would be - it’s classic empty rhetoric, yet people still applaud him and cheer and faint at his speeches.) But of course, the right/left-wing two-party system is a false dichotomy; there really is no difference between Bush and Obama in terms of the agenda they serve. They’re puppets controlled by the same puppetmaster. I feel that Bush laid a good bit of groundwork and now Obama will build on it, taking us a few steps closer to the New World Order.
Normally I ignore the mass media and politics, thinking it’s all staged and a farce. But I observed this US election and the media furore surrounding it and shook my head at it all. The only seemingly sane voice to be heard, from what I gather, is Libertarian Ron Paul - advocate of freedom AND limited government (the two go hand-in-hand). But can any politician be 100% independent of the elite agenda, and still get their voice heard and mount a serious campaign? I doubt it. So who knows. But I do feel this is an interesting time in history, so I’m observing it all from a distance with a sceptical mind.
UPDATE (June 2009): I subscribe to a newsletter pertaining to all things spiritual and conspiracy-related, from an esoteric Christian perspective. I got an email recently and was kind of surprised to read their take on Obama: according to them, he is not working for the elite at all, but purely his own selfish agenda, and his election was not part of the elite’s plan. That threw me for a loop. Personally I find it hard to believe in light of the fact that the elite-owned media seemed to aggressively promote Obama, and the fact the whole election process is questionable anyway. I suppose the jury is still out on the new prez...
0 comments:
Post a Comment